June 22, 2008
-
You Can’t Photograph That!!
When Amos and I were told we could not take photographs on “private property” at the Pacific Design Center the other night; the more I thought about it, the angrier I became. So I did a little research, and as it turns out, I’m not the only one who’s angry or confused. And even after reading all of this information, I’m still not clear as to whether I have a right to photograph Garbo & Ruby at the Pacific Design Center, or the lawn of Beverly Hills City Hall (another place I was kicked out of by the police for taking pictures without a permit a few years ago. If you really want to be shocked, take a look at what the city charges for a permit!!), or the subway, or the Port of Los Angeles. If anyone is interested in reading up on this, here are a few links:
You Can’t Photograph That!!
Taking pictures on LA’s Red Line violates the “9/11 Law”
Orwellian Los Angeles
Two FBI agents just showed up at my door… (I think I’m being investigated)
This is Broken – Anti Photo Policies
Photographer grills security guard about dumb policy
Photography and the Law: Know Your Rights
Your Rights and Remedies When Stopped or Confronted for Photography
Yet, according to this article in USA Today, “You can take photos any place that’s open to the public, whether or not
it’s private property. A mall, for example, is open to the public. So
are most office buildings (at least the lobbies). You don’t need
permission; if you have permission to enter, you have permission to
shoot.”Amos isn’t even allowed to bring his zoom lens to sporting events! So, if he wanted to get a closeup of David Beckham’s package like this:
He’s have to work for Getty Images!! (Or Armani:)
Gratuitous Beckham shot that has nothing to do with this post.So which is it? Can I photograph the dogs at the PDC or not? It seems that in just the past week I’ve broken many laws, like:
Photographing the elevated train tracks in Chicago. Is that REALLY an iPod ad??
Photographing the Port of Los Angeles from the air. Is that a nuclear submarine??
Fraternizing with known drug users! (I didn’t inhale during this photo.)If I don’t blog tomorrow, you’ll know the FBI arrested me, and whisked me off to Guantanamo. (I hope I can share a cell with Harold & Kumar!). Do you think Guantanamo has wi-fi? Before I go however, I’m going to post these illegal photos that Amos took with his penis envy lens.
Even though that’s my watermark, Amos actually took these, and gets full credit.
The watermark goes on automatically when I shrink these for the blog. The actual photos were about 9 MB each as .jpgs and even bigger in RAW format, but they look amazing. It’s hard to tell when they’re this small.
Another illegal photograph I took at the PDC in February, of Roscoe.I’ll end with this photo I secretly took today from my balcony (is that illegal??). This guy was walking his dog in my front yard, and the dog has a TATTOO!!!! If you look closely you’ll see a red heart on the dog’s hip. I’ve heard of tattoos of dogs, but tattoos ON dogs?? I swear, only in LA. LOL
Comments (17)
no photography rules are just bogus. i still sneak shots despite the warnings. once i was taking pictures of a highrise in downtown LA. some security guard told me i wasn’t allowed to. i stopped, but later i realized that he was just trying to be more important he was. what’s lamer is at the overhyped pinkberry, they also have a no photography rule…how pretentious.
I can understand businesses not wanting photography taken on their premises; there are legitimate security concerns. But it definitely gets out of control when people start citing “the 9/11 law”. That’s just ignorant.
I think they are totally over-reacting and unreasonable!
I remember when traveling in Japan, the guidebooks warned that if you had a tripod then it would look like you were taking pictures for professional purposes and you needed a permit if you were in a temple or something like that. I think the rules though are inconsistent and some have roots in paranoia.
welcome to the land of the free and the home of the brave! run and hide! run and hide! peace, Al
Somehow that railroad station looks like Japan. Is it really Chicago??lol
@generasianx - Here here! It’s nice to have allies like you Tony!
@christao408 - Ignorance indeed!
@stevew918 - Can I get an Amen!
@ElusiveWords - Paranoia AND greed (for permits!)
@pukemeister - Sad but true.
@kim85 - It most assuredly is Chicago. I don’t even remember ever seeing any elevated rail tracks in Japan!
Rules are meant to be broken.
I was recently in LA … I wonder if I took illegal pics. Probably.Oh well.
Maybe if you sneak in a compact camera or a camera phone…
i liked the aerial view of los angelos and the el train in chicago the best.
hope you are on our side of the jail right now.
@ihaveabug - I like that attitude!
@Fongster8 - I shouldn’t have to!
@razzlebash - Thanks!
thanks for stopping by! =D and great sky shot. those dog pics makes me miss mines. =
@D_Nguyen - Awww! Where are your dogs?
Awesome post, thanks for all the info! That’s a sweet pic of the Chicago tracks.
@davballguy - Happy to be of service!
You got to!
My post is nothing compared to actual movie … “we’re not worthy … we’re not worthy”.
Just like in the movie “Wayne’s World” …
Enjoy!
@thaotrai117 - Oh don’t worry, I will definitely be watching it now!