bush

  • Civic Duty, Deliberations & Google’s Gadgets

    One of the good (or bad, depending on how you look at it) things about traveling as much as I did for 15 years and not even having an address for the last 5 of those years, is that I have never been summoned for jury duty.  Until now. 

    Don’t get me wrong.  I was actually looking forward to the day I got to serve on a jury.  It’s something I’ve always been curious about.  The group dynamic and the whole deliberation process fascinates me (see below).  Since I’ve actually had a real home now for 5+ years, I was wondering if they were ever going to “find” me.  I’m a registered voter and I have a driver’s license, so I suspected it was only a matter of time (unless there was some felony in my deep dark past that I didn’t know about!) until my civic duty caught up with me.  Unfortunately, that time has now come, and it’s…..drum roll please…

    NEW YEAR’S EVE!!!???

    juryduty3 [800x600]

    WTF??  Who starts a jury trial on New Year’s Eve?  Don’t they know about the fabulous “GLY group” of friends I’ve traveled all over the world with on New Year’s Eve for the past ten years???  Surely the must know about that?  Don’t they read my blog?  Who do they think they are??

    Having no experience whatsoever with this, I had no idea what to do.  The summons was quite clear about the consequences for not appearing:

    juryduty2

    Since horizontal stripes aren’t exactly slimming, I thought I had best respond, even though I would have a good alibi in the fact that I only open mail twice a year, LOL. 

    The stupid summons said nothing about postponement either.  Basically what it said was that the only way you could get out of jury duty was if you were dead, or had one of these excuses:

    Medical Excuses – Complete Section E of your summons. If you are over 70, a physician’s statement is NOT required, but you must provide your age, date of birth and the reason for your medical excuse in the space provided in Section D. All requests for excuse must be signed in Section G.

    Financial Hardship – Financial Hardship requests are strictly scrutinized. The fact that your employer does not pay for jury service is not sufficient grounds for excuse. You must be able to demonstrate how service as a juror will cause you EXTREME hardship. Section C must be completed. Failure to complete Section C in its entirety will cause automatic qualification for jury service.

    Transfer – To change to another court location within the county, you must provide a legally sufficient reason in writing indicating why you are prevented from appearing at the courthouse to which you have been randomly summoned by computer. A written request, briefly explaining your hardship, must be provided in Section D. Only a true hardship is grounds for a transfer, inconvenience is not.

    I was scared to call the number to register because I thought once I was officially “in the system”, there would be no way to escape the Matrix.

    matrix

    Enter Google, to save the day!  Once I learned that I could actually postpone my jury duty (one time only) by calling the number, I gladly called and was actually pleasantly surprised by the efficiency of the automated phone system!  (There’s a first!)  Bottom line, is now I don’t have to report for jury duty until January 22nd.

    (Speaking of Google, did you see that they added a Hong Kong skyline theme to their theme menu, that changes in light and texture based on the time of day!?  I LOVE it!!  It’s almost as good as being there, or at least looking at Skunky’s photos!  They also added  the solar system, showing a new scene for each day of the week; a family of raccoons playing in a leaf pile; a tiger on Jeju Island, South Korea; and JR, the lovable monster who grapples with life in a city for which he is entirely too big.

    Hong Kong skyline photo courtesy of master photographer Jeff (Skunky)!!

    Google and its gadgets make my life so much easier.  If you use Firefox (and why wouldn’t you? Except for the fact that embedded material like YouTube videos don’t show up in the Xanga editor, anyone know why??) you should also check out the Google toolbar add-ons for Firefox.  I can highlight any word on any webpage and instantly search for it in Wikipedia, YouTube, the New York Times, dictionary.com, and so on.  It’s a real time saver.

    Another trick I just learned was that you could type “link:”any website url”" into google to find how many other webpages are linked to that site.  Not sure how #2 got on mine, but it’s an interesting tool nonetheless.  (Actually, I must have a Xanga entry tagged with “celebrities” just like “talky alex“) )

    Sorry….that was a LONG parenthetical phrase….I digress.  Back to, what was I talking about?  Oh yeah, juries.  I was recently thinking more about the whole “deliberation” process after receiving some advice I solicited from a good friend.  The advice concerned how to respond to an emailed article that originally came from some military grunt forum that stated, among other things, that:

    President Bush did not make a mistake in his handling of terrorism. He made the mistake of believing that we still had the courage and fortitude of our fathers. He believed that this was still the country that our fathers fought so dearly to preserve. It is not the same country. It is now a cross between Sodom and Gomorrah and the land of Oz. We did unite for a short while after 911, but our attitude changed when we found out that defending our country would require some sacrifices.

    Ugh!  Which way to the vomitorium??  After reading this, I wanted to send one of my sharply critical emails attacking the author’s position that people who don’t support the war (and the president) live an immoral life and that Muslims:

    [sic] believe that it is okay, even their duty, to kill anyone who will not convert to Islam. It has been estimated that about one-third or over three hundred million Muslims are sympathetic to the terrorists cause…Hitler and Tojo combined did not have nearly that many potential recruits.


    …This makes it OK for us to go to war with Iraq!!??  Lord & Taylor, where to begin??? 

    So anyway as I started writing my response, I thought twice and asked the advice of a wise friend who I consider an expert in matters of diplomacy.  I hope he doesn’t mind me paraphrasing some of what he told me:

    The person who wrote this article, buys into a version of generational difference that makes me think he is a staunch supporter of patriotism, and that his brain is wired in well-defined systems of dichotomous information-processing.  It would be difficult to engage such a thinker in a conversion mission—which is what I suspect you would like to do.  Instead, I would approach this as an ideal jury deliberation:

    Parties agree to discuss an issue, parties accept they may change their minds after hearing everyone out and deliberating collectively.  Every person agrees that one can understand another’s opinion without having to accept their positions.  Each person should lay out his/her opinion while everyone else does their best to listen carefully without passing judgment (recent research indicates only well-trained minds can do this at will).  Closure only comes when parties feel they have said all they wanted, are at peace with their deliberations, and can at least understand other parties’ reasoning for differing views about the same subject. 

    In concrete ways, I would agree with several of the points in the article that were made about people coming together and then I would present my own counter-evidence.  I would make the point that the same people did despicable things to fellow Americans during the same time exactly BECAUSE they saw the world, and America, in the dichotomous ways (us versus them) that allows for that type of unquestioned unity. For instance, Japanese American citizens were taken from their homes, put into concentration camps inside the United States, children were separated from parents, no explanations were given to parents or children, no order of the law was followed, no trials were conducted, and no amendments were made after years of such treatment.  All this while using Japanese American soldiers to fight the war in the Pacific region. 

    Very similar things happened to Native Americans.  The same generation took children away from families, by force, without explanation, to raise them in warehouses across America well into the 60s.  Women were pushed out of jobs once the war was over.  WWII GIs were given 2 years of salary with no questions asked for serving the nation in the war, then had their college education paid for 100% without restrictions of place, tuition cost, etc.  This contrasts in extreme forms with the way Iraq War vets are being treated by the current administration (you know the details here).  America did not follow a pre-emptive strike, but it was rather forced into the war by a strategy perceived by the population as cowardly (Pearl Harbor).  There are a thousand points to be made here in rather objective ways.

    perceptions Bravo!!  This kind of goes back to my “Perceptions” post about generational differences and how they affect the way we see the world.  It’s doubtful that the author of the article that sparked this will ever read this entry (maybe he’ll Google himself).  If he does, perhaps it will spark a deliberation that I will now be better prepared for.  Besides, as my wise friend also stated, I could always tell him that this email changed my life in such a profound way that I’ve decided to fly to Iraq and serve as a peace liaison because I felt the inextricable pull of patriotism!  Hmmm…maybe deliberation isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.  Guess I’ll find out on January 22nd.  Let’s hope it’s not a murder trial!!

  • All GLY Things Must Come To An End

    After a week of staying up until dawn each night, laughing, crying and eating far too much, I will fly out of Portland tomorrow with the promise that our group of worldwide friends will meet again next month in Pacifica to commemorate our 10th New Year’s Eve together.  Who would have thought that what started ten years ago as a bunch of connected strangers sitting around a pool in Brazil, eating mangoes and sharing life stories; would evolve into a globetrotting GLY family that continues to grow!  Thanks especially to Marcelo & Emily for their undying hospitality and reciprocal altruism   You guys are the greatest!!  I hope you still feel the same about me after the heating bill comes!

    I got the best e-card from Christine today.  Anyone who can make something rhyme with “Careyfornia” is a lifelong friend in my book!!

    card 

     A poem for you:

    The pied piper, the voodoo donut lover, My 2nd husband, my converse wearing brother.

    You may smooch Bassam, or asians galore, but my triangle friend it’s you I adore.

    With stories of Quandetta and graciously giving gum; having to do what the group wants isn’t always fun.

    3 holes or 2,  hating ipod phones; Tawny Kitaen, 88′ camrys, and leaving Britney alone.

    Hangin at the beach, singin Christmas tunes; food, friends, joy, and pictures of the moon.

    Jim in Florida, pretending not to expect us; Turkey day as fabulous, even better than Festivus (he he)

    Would love to see you soon and maybe I should warn you, you may be seeing me soon at hotel Careyfornia.

    Love,

    Christine

    I also had a sweet drawing from Patrick (with some help from Mommy methinks) when we got home from dinner tonight:

    IMG_3680 [640x480]

    We had dinner with Perry at McMenamins Kennedy School.  It’s an old Portland school that has been converted into many “classroom” bars, a movie theater, a hotel and a restaurant.  Before that I had lunch with Susan, and she gave me a wonderful countdown gift:

    IMG_3642 [640x480]

    Here are the rest of the photos:

    IMG_3592 [640x480]

    IMG_3593 [640x480]

    When she gave me this, it was set wrong.  Thank goodness it WAS wrong!

    IMG_3597 [640x480]

    Now THIS is how I remember Portland in November!!

    IMG_3603 [640x480]

    LOTS of rain!

    IMG_3614 [640x480]

    I stayed at the hotel connected to this restaurant, 150 nights one year!

    IMG_3634 [640x480]

    IMG_3632 [640x480]

    IMG_3635 [640x480]

     IMG_3637 [640x480]

    IMG_3059 [640x480]

    I couldn’t resist comparing their TV to my cell phone, which I mounted over the fireplace to watch live TV!

    IMG_3684 [640x480]

    IMG_3673 [640x480]

     

  • Fun in the Sun, Finally Flickr & A Crushing Defeat in the Fight Against AIDS


    I’m finally walking again…though trying to stay off my ankle as much as possible.  It’s a whole lot better than it was last week though.  So…not much new to report.  I got an email yesterday from my friend Luci in Brazil.  She sent me some pictures of her kids, which I just had to post:

    Carey Anthony<careygly@gmail.com>


    Fun in the Sun – News from Brazil!

    From: Luciana Tue, Nov 6, 2007 at 8:31 AM
    To:Carey

    Greetings from Sunny Brazil!
    Just wanted to share with you some pictures of our four day weekend in Buzios (near Rio) three weeks ago.
    Lucas is 2 years and 8 months old  and Amanda is 1 year and 3 months old!

    Hope all is well with you.  Please send us news!

    Luci
    Upper School Counselor/VHS Site Coordinator
    Graded – The American School of São Paulo, Brazil


    From:  Carey Tue, Nov 6, 2007 at 10:02 AM
    To:Luciana

    Oi Lu,

    I just got off the phone with Department of Children & Family Services.  I’m not sure if their jurisdiction will reach Brazil, but I HAD to file a complaint about a possible crime.  You see, depriving such BEAUTIFUL children the chance of fame and fortune by not sending them to live in Hollywood with their Uncle Carey and pursue a modeling/acting career, is tantamount to child neglect.  I’m sorry it had to come to this, but it’s for the children. I hope you understand.  Until my attorney contacts you, please kiss the children, and give yourself a strong hug for bringing such angels into our world!

    Beijos,

    Carey


      




    Thanks so much to Albert, who pointed me to this great website that allows you to embed your Flickr photos anywhere you want.  That’s Luci and her husband in the first picture, and a bunch of photos I took in Brazil the last time I was there.  The neatest thing is that you can access any of my over 8000 Flickr photos all from this one slideshow.  You just have to click “Info” and enter my Flickr name: CareyAnthony.  Then just choose a set.  I love it!

    Update:  I’ve left Flickr…they pissed me off.  Stay tuned




    Finally, I received some very disturbing news today.  I don’t know how much press this is going to get, but I find it truly shocking that a promising HIV vaccine, designed to immunize people against the disease before they get it, actually might be increasing the chance for test study volunteers to contract HIV and therefore AIDS.  I have a good friend who is enrolled in this trial.  He received 3 vaccinations, though since it was a blinded study, he had no way of knowing whether he got the vaccine or a placebo.  Merck, the company that conducted the trials, is going to un-blind the study, so soon my friend will know if he actually received the vaccine.  If so, he is more at risk of contracting HIV than had he not enrolled in this trial. 


    He was guaranteed by Merck that the trial could in no way infect him.  So, in essence, by trying to do a good thing and advance the study and science of HIV prevention, he now may be at risk.  Of course this is all speculation at this point, but how dare a worldwide pharmaceutical company like Merck expose people to such a horrific possibility.  My friend is beside himself with worry…nearly sick to his stomach.  I wish the best for him and for the other 3,000 study participants nationwide.  Here’s more, from Time magazine:


    Assessing a Failed AIDS Vaccine

    A T-lymphocyte white blood cell infected with AIDS virus (green).

    After 20 years of defeat, it appeared that science may have finally
    developed a viable vaccine against AIDS. Merck’s new drug, V520, was
    being tested in a huge clinical trial, involving 3,000 people in 15
    cities, and it was widely considered the most promising new candidate
    in the field. But last September, when Merck analyzed its initial trial
    data, it found that the vaccine had failed — and failed miserably. On
    Wednesday, the company issued its first report on the V520 trials,
    revealing that the drug did not protect against HIV, and more
    disturbingly, actually increased some people’s susceptibility to the
    virus. “I don’t think anyone imagined the results would be so
    definitively negative so quickly,” says Dr. Gary Nabel, director of the
    Vaccine Research Center at the National Institutes of Health.




    V520 may have failed, but somewhere in the details of the drug’s
    nonsuccess, scientists hope to find insight into what will make future
    vaccines work. After all, V520 is just one of about 50 experimental HIV
    vaccines that are currently being tested in clinical trials, and almost
    all of them are designed to function the same way. While most vaccines
    expose the body to weakened or killed viruses, or pieces of them, to
    boost production of antibodies — proteins that recognize invading cells
    and flag them for destruction — that tack alone was too feeble to fend
    off HIV. The new class of vaccines, including V520, takes a more direct
    route: They trigger cell-mediated immunity, which marshals killer T
    cells that both recognize and destroy viruses and bacteria, and can
    lead to a more robust, specific and longer-lived immune defense.

    It’s not yet clear why V520 didn’t work, but one theory involves its
    vector, or delivery vehicle. Like almost every other AIDS vaccine in
    development, Merck’s drug used the common cold virus to transport its
    payload — three synthetic HIV genes — into the body’s cells. What makes
    the adenovirus ideal for the task is precisely the reason colds make us
    so miserable — once inside a host, the cold virus infects cells and
    starts to replicate quickly. The down side to that efficiency, however,
    is that cold viruses are so common that most people have developed a
    certain level of tolerance to them; if the adenovirus fails to excite
    the immune system, then any bugs piggybacked on the virus, such as HIV
    genes, will also slip past immune defenses. That’s exactly what appears
    to have happened in the Merck trial: People with the highest
    pre-existing immunity to the common cold also had the highest rates of
    infection with HIV.

    “It could be due to chance, or to differences in the populations we
    studied, or to something related to the vaccine itself,” says Dr. Keith
    Gottesdiener, vice president of Vaccine and Infectious Disease Clinical
    Research at Merck. “The ‘why’ is still not well known.”

    Researchers have already set about trying to figure it out. “We have
    to remember that Merck’s was a single product testing a vaccine
    concept, which is that T cell immunity can protect against HIV
    infection,” says Nabel. “And we know there are other ways to stimulate
    T cell immunity.” Nabel is ready to test one such method, a vaccine
    similar to Merck’s that uses different HIV genes and a “prime-boost”
    approach that involves two injections spaced a few months apart,
    instead of one shot, to maximize the stimulation of the body’s T cells.
    Other researchers, like Dr. David Ho, director of the Aaron Diamond
    AIDS Research Center in New York City and the recipient of a $25
    million grant from the Gates Foundation to study novel vaccine
    strategies, think that the cold virus isn’t the best way to deliver
    HIV. Ho is exploring the possibility that a different vector, such as
    the chicken pox virus, or perhaps no vector at all — simply injecting
    snippets of naked HIV DNA — could yield stronger immune responses.

    At the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI), a non-profit
    group of public and private partners focused on funding and
    accelerating AIDS vaccine research, scientists are studying the use of
    crippled, live strains of HIV — based on the success of other such live
    attenuated vaccines against polio and measles — which they think might
    be critical to waking up the right immune system defenses. “There is
    something magical about the replicating virus, because it has virtually
    its entire genome,” says Dr. Seth Berkley, president of IAVI. His group
    is also investigating ways to stimulate so-called neutralizing
    antibodies, a special class of antibodies that appear to be able to
    defuse HIV.

    Despite the ongoing study, experts argue that none of it will
    succeed without some basic changes in the way it’s conducted. Most
    research occurs in isolation; there’s little coordination among labs
    and no network through which data can be shared, making it difficult
    for scientists to learn from each other’s missteps. Worse, it takes
    years to get regulatory approval to start a human trial for a new
    vaccine — not to mention enrolling the volunteers and training the
    right personnel — so, by the time experiments get underway, the science
    around which the vaccine was built has long since become outdated. “The
    trials are not informing science at the moment,” says Dr. Alan
    Bernstein, executive director of the Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise, an
    alliance of independent organizations dedicated to accelerating HIV
    vaccine research. “Science — and vaccine development — is an iterative
    process, except that in HIV vaccine research, there isn’t a lot of
    iteration going on.”

    The Enterprise, which was founded in 2005, intends to change that.
    With funding from the Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, National
    Institutes of Health and the European Union, it will serve as a hub for
    guiding worldwide HIV vaccine research. �We want to ensure that the
    trials are done faster, better and smarter,� says Bernstein. And
    hopefully, with more success.

    For Merck’s official press release today, click here.




    Arnold’s Constitutionality & Flickr Foibles



    Please note that until the writer’s strike is over this blog will only contain photos.  Just kidding.   Though they say if the strike lasts a long time, it could have 
    devastating and far-reaching effects on the local economy.





    I got in to a 5 against 1 heated debate the other day with my friends over the following issue:


    The “Arnold Amendment”
    Should we amend the Constitution to let foreign-born U.S. citizens become president?
    BackgroundWhen the Framers wrote the Constitution in 1787, they feared theinfluence foreign powers and foreign wealth might have on the newnation. In Europe, royal families in one country often tried to put oneof their own on another nation’s throne. To prevent some powerfulEuropean nobleman from coming to America, buying up political favorsand seizing the presidency, the Framers adopted a clause makingforeign-born U.S. citizens (except those present at the time of theConstitution’s adoption) ineligible to become president. For most ofthe 216 years since the adoption of the Constitution, there has beenlittle debate about this provision. But now there are four proposals inCongress to permit foreign-born citizens to runfor president. Each allows a foreign-born American to run for presidentafter a lengthy period of citizenship. Arnold Schwarzenegger, has become anemblem for the cause. Advocates of change say the current provision isout-of-date and un-American. Millions of immigrants have made this themost diverse nation on Earth and contributed to its strength. As amatter of equal rights, proponents say, they should have an equalchance to dream about becoming president. Opponents say the Framers’concerns about the possibility of divided allegiances are still validand that the Constitution should not be changed.


    Our debate wasn’t actually about Arnold, it was about a Constitutional Amendment to allow foreign-born US citizens to become president.  I’m as liberal as the next Californian, but this is something I actually don’t support (which scares me, because it really is a red state/blue state issue).  It’s not because I don’t like Arnold, and it’s not because I don’t think there are plenty of foreign born Americans who would make excellent presidents.  I suppose I’m a bit of a Constitutionalist (if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it) at heart.  But I couldn’t articulate to my friends my reasoning.  To be honest, I think they were quite flabbergasted at my perceived intolerance.  (For the record, I’m also not in favor of a Constitutional Amendment to allow gay marriage (nor certainly one to ban it), though I fully support gay marriage.  I just think it’s something for the states to decide, and it doesn’t belong in the Constitution any more than an amendment about the right to celebrate Christmas.  But that’s a whole other blog entry.)


    I, like most Americans (even the foreign born ones who went to US schools), grew up reciting the Pledge of Allegiance every morning at school:

    I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands; one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.



    I believe that patriotism, like family bonds, are something we learn at a very young age.  In most cases, we are bound by our countries of birth as tightly as we are bound by our families, inextricably.  I can’t imagine that’s a typically American feeling.  Surely this one country doesn’t cause everyone who comes here to want to pledge their allegiance to our flag.  I’m an Italian American, and though I would love to live in Italy if my lifestyle could afford it, I would never pledge allegiance to Italy. (Though I did root for them to win the World Cup!)

    But maybe my thinking is too American.  As the National Review pointed out:

    One of the wonders of American culture, of course, is the spectacle ofpeople becoming American. We call this assimilation or, lessclinically, Americanization. It is a rough process that affects peoplein different ways. On an individual level, it includes successes,failures, and much in between. It also holds a special place in thepublic imagination-most Americans can name an immigrant forebear, and agreat many know immigrant ancestors as more than names. Their storiesof arriving here, learning English, and gaining citizenship are centralnot just to millions of family histories, but to the whole country’ssense of itself. As Harvard’s Oscar Handlin remarked 50 years ago,”Once I thought to write a history of the immigrants in America. Then Idiscovered that immigrants were American history.” By proposing toremove the single legal distinction the United States makes betweencitizens by birth and citizens by choice (their own or their parents’),an Amendment would fit inside a grand tradition of assimilation andacceptance.



    But, as pointed out in The Spectator (God, now I’m quoting The Spectator!  What’s happening to me??):

    But the risk goesbeyond the potential of foreign powers planting someone in thepresidency or influencing a president born and raised abroad. Even aforeign-born president not subject to malign foreign influence is arisk not worth taking, given that unavoidably divided loyalties (due toan attachment to a country in which the president was born and raised,has fond memories of, family in, and so on) could make him eitherdangerous or ineffectual. Theframers’ concern about divided loyalties wasn’t nativist caprice but arealistic recognition that a president needs to have an extremely deepattachment to America in order to serve it effectively in times ofcrisis.



    So is my thinking flawed?  Not that it should matter, but 4 out of 5 of the friends that I had this debate with were not born in the United States.  And the fifth is so liberal that she has a New York accent even though she’s from Texas!    So my final question to my friends was this;

    “Would you want George W. Bush to be able to become president of your countries??” 

    And besides, does anybody remember what happened the last time as Austrian became president of another country?  Sorry (On no he di’nt!)


     



    On a completely unrelated note, does anybody know how to embed Flickr sets in Xanga?  It’s driving me crazy.

    IMG_1166IMG_1561IMG_1560IMG_1559IMG_1558IMG_1556IMG_1555IMG_1551IMG_1548IMG_1547IMG_1542IMG_1539IMG_1538IMG_1532IMG_1531IMG_1530IMG_1525IMG_1523IMG_1519IMG_1511IMG_1505IMG_1501IMG_1499IMG_1498IMG_1480IMG_1479IMG_1478IMG_1475IMG_1472IMG_1462IMG_1453IMG_1424IMG_1474IMG_1468IMG_1407IMG_1362IMG_1400IMG_1399IMG_1397IMG_1396IMG_1394IMG_1391IMG_1381IMG_1370IMG_1365IMG_1358IMG_1351IMG_1323IMG_1318IMG_1300IMG_1296IMG_1291IMG_1270IMG_1268IMG_1262IMG_1248IMG_1244IMG_1235IMG_1232IMG_1231IMG_1218IMG_1215IMG_1209IMG_1207IMG_1188IMG_1184IMG_1183IMG_1177IMG_1169IMG_1164IMG_1158IMG_1150IMG_1147IMG_1144IMG_1143IMG_1138IMG_1132IMG_1131IMG_1126IMG_1125IMG_1123IMG_1122IMG_1120IMG_1118IMG_1109

     

  • The “Increasingly Few” & Proud

    Update:  I got this message on my myspace today.  It’s nice to hear this come from a real Marine.  Again, it’s comforting to know that people like Jimmy are out there trying to preserve our way of life.  God love him!

    From: jimmyshea   Jimmy Shea

    myspace.com/jimmydshea

    Date: Oct 10, 2007 5:24 AM
    Subject: RE: War
     

    Carey, I am also completely against the war…I know that might sound hypocritical, but joining the Marine Corps had nothing to do with the war. Thank you for all your compliments, although I don’t see my videos as anything more than me trying to make my siblings back at home laugh, maybe someday something a little bit bigger will come out of it. Either way, I’m happy.

    It’s people like you, who support the troops despite how they feel about the war, who keep us going.

    Thank you.

    Jimmy Shea



    After reading about Britain’s recent troop withdrawals and watching Jimmy’s YouTube videos from Okinawa, especially the one below in which he answers a few of the questions I wrote about several months ago, I’m reposting portions of an entry from last spring.  It’s nice to know that we have Marines like Jimmy Shea fighting for the rights that even now I feel are slipping through our fingers. –Carey

    391 days until the 2008 election!!

    (564,403 minutes…how do you measure a year + of Bush?)

    Ruin seize thee ruthless King!
    Confusion on thy banners wait
    Though fanned by conquest’s crimson wing
    They mock the air with idle state.
    – Thomas Gray, The Bard


    “Betrayed Bush Said to be Seething Over Britain’s Iraq Troop Withdrawal”  Read more…

    The “Coalition” continues to erode – including Iceland’s 2 troops (one female) that have since been withdrawn. (Source: Wikipedia). 

    The numbers are telling:

    • Flag of the United States United States: 250,000 invasion168,000 current (9/07)
    • Flag of the United Kingdom United Kingdom: 45,000 invasion5,250 current (10/07)
    • Flag of Poland Poland: 194 invasion–2,500 peak–900 current (2/07)
    • Flag of Australia Australia: 2,000 invasion638 current (2/07)

    TOTAL INVASION DEPLOYMENT, REGULAR TROOPS
    297,494

    • Flag of South Korea South Korea: 3,600 peak – 1,200 current (5/07; deployed 5/03)
    • Flag of Romania Romania: 730 peak – 405 current (5/07; deployed 7/03)
    • Flag of El Salvador El Salvador: 380 peak – 300 current (8/07; deployed 08/03)
    • Flag of the Czech Republic Czech Republic: 300 peak–89 current (5/07)
    • Flag of Azerbaijan Azerbaijan: 250 troops (2/07)
    • Flag of Georgia (country) Georgia: 2,000 troops (10/07)
    • Flag of Denmark Denmark: 545 peak – 55 current (9/07, deployed 04/03)
    • Flag of Mongolia Mongolia: 180 peak–100 current (2/07; deployed 8/03)
    • Flag of Albania Albania: 120 troops (2/07)
    • Flag of Armenia Armenia: 46 current (2/07; deployed 1/05)
    • Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina: 36 troops (2/07; deployed 6/05)
    • Flag of Estonia Estonia: 35 current (2/07; deployed 6/05)
    • Flag of the Republic of Macedonia Macedonia: 33 troops (2/07; deployed 7/03)
    • Flag of Kazakhstan Kazakhstan: 29 troops (2/07; deployed 9/03)
    • Flag of Moldova Moldova: 24 peak–12 current (2/07; deployed 9/03)
    • Flag of Bulgaria Bulgaria: 485 peak–155 current (2/07; deployed 5/03)

    TOTAL CURRENT DEPLOYMENT AS OF AUGUST 2007
    177,953 Regular Troops
    ~182,000 Private military contractors (118,000 Iraqi, 43,000 Other, 21,000 US)

    NATO Training Mission – Iraq
    Countries involved with the NATO training mission, NATO NTM-I

    • Flag of Latvia Latvia: 136 peak–(deployed 4/04 – withdrawn 08/07)
    • Flag of Lithuania Lithuania: 120 peak (withdrawn 08/07)
    • Flag of Slovakia Slovakia: 110 peak (deployed 8/03 – withdrawn 01/07)
    • Flag of Italy Italy: 3,200 peak (deployed 7/03 – withdrawn 11/06)
    • Flag of Ukraine Ukraine: 1,650 troops (deployed 8/03 – withdrawn 12/05)
    • Flag of the Netherlands Netherlands: 1,345 troops (deployed 7/03 – withdrawn 3/05)
    • Flag of Spain Spain: 1,300 troops (deployed 4/03 – withdrawn 4/04)
    • Flag of Japan Japan: 600 troops (deployed 1/04 – withdrawn 7/06)
    • Flag of Thailand Thailand: 423 troops (deployed 8/03 – withdrawn 8/04)
    • Flag of Honduras Honduras: 368 troops (deployed 08/03 – withdrawn 5/04)
    • Flag of the Dominican Republic Dominican Republic: 302 troops (withdrawn 5/04)
    • Flag of Hungary Hungary: 300 troops (deployed 08/03 – withdrawn 3/05)
    • Flag of Nicaragua Nicaragua: 230 troops (deployed 09/03 – withdrawn 2/04)
    • Flag of Singapore Singapore: 192 troops (deployed 12/03 – withdrawn 3/05)
    • Flag of Norway Norway: 150 troops (withdrawn 8/06)
    • Flag of Portugal Portugal: 128 troops (deployed 11/03 – withdrawn 2/05)
    • Flag of New Zealand New Zealand: 61 troops (deployed 9/03 – withdrawn 9/04)
    • Flag of the Philippines Philippines: 51 troops (deployed 7/03 – withdrawn 7/04)
    • Flag of Tonga Tonga: 45 troops (deployed 7/04 – withdrawn 12/04)
    • Flag of Iceland Iceland: 2 troops (deployed 5/03 – withdrawn date unknown)

    I’m not a big fan of the traditional news outlets by any stretch, but for a truly excellent overview of the regional powerplay in the Middle East, take a look at this.  So many Americans are ignorant to the centuries of conflict and geopolitical strife in that region.  Yes, for Bush & Cheney it’s about oil, but for the millions of citizens of the Middle East, it’s about geography (and sadly, religion, but that’s another topic).  If you don’t understand a Sunni from a Shiite, take a look at this presentation.  Click to begin:

    fightforiraq

    Haditha - Not easy to read, but important.

    The Resistance in Iraq is now filling their improvised explosive devices (IED’s) with human feces so that if our soldiers don’t die in the explosion they will die from infection.  Who did they learn this from?  Ask Donald Rumsfeld.  It is so clear that we are not wanted there…by ANYONE, Shiites, Kurds or Sunnis.



    TALES OF UROLAGNIA AND COPROPHILIA

    Malcom Lagauche

     


    pissmarine

    Don’t let the words of the title confuse you. They are the technical terms for an affinity for human urine and feces. I’m not talking about the practices as sexual fetishes of some people but as weapons in U.S. military operations.

    Currently, a court case is being held at Camp Pendleton in California that concerns the killing of 24 civilians in Haditha, Iraq. The incident was buried in officialdom until a U.S. Marine came forward to challenge the party line that the dead were resistance fighters. All were innocent civilians.

    Sgt. Sanick Dela Cruz, who took part in the bloody massacre, has been granted immunity for his testifying as a prosecution witness. According to a Reuters report, “Marine Says Urinated on Dead Iraqi at Haditha, “published on May 10, 2007:  Read More…


    The Terrible Killings in Haditha  – The Few, The Shamed, The Marines
     
    flag
     

    I just don’t know what to make of this interview, but I think every serviceman in Iraq or Afghanistan should see it.  And for those of us here, (especially the 110 pound soccer moms driving their 6 year old kids to school in a 3 ton, $45,000 Ford Expedition that gets14 mpg), it’s a rude awakening (and we wonder why they hate us so much!?). These ”soldiers” are children  playing war games.  Many of them are 18 or 19 with only a GED.  One of the most frequently asked questions on the Marine Corp. website is “How far will I have to run?”. This is George W. Bush’s dirty little secret (well, one of them).  My first reaction to the brutal slaying of innocent women and children is that this “soldier of misfortune” should be in prison for the rest of his life for his bloodthirsty rampage.  Though when you watch the interview (Scott Pelley did an excellent job I thought), you can practically see this soldier’s demons haunting him, as I’m sure they will forever.  The question then however, is who’s responsible?  Obviously as the battalion leader he was responsible for ordering his men to “shoot first, ask questions later”.   

    marines

    But why was he a battalion leader if he had never seen combat?  Though he had been in the Marines for years, he asked  to go back to active duty,because, he wanted  to see combat (??).  The men under him had combat experience while he had none.  So where does the ultimate blame lie?  The Marines who train these kids, many of whom can’t get into college or find a decent job?  The September11th hijackers? (We all now know, that Iraq played no part in that!).  Donald Rumsfeld?  George Bush?  I think Bush’s reaction to this massacre in the interview is absurd (what else is new?).  He has more blood on his hands than anyone in this “nation destroying war” (ours and theirs). When will it end??  Will we even make it to November 4, 2008?? 

    This 2005 family photo provided by attorney Mark S. Zaid shows Frank Wuterich of Meriden, Conn. Staff Sgt. Wuterich, a Marine Corps squad leader, was charged with murdering 12 people and ordering Marines under his command to kill others during an incident that left 24 civilians dead in the Iraqi town of Haditha in 2005. (CBS)

    “He fired and killed everybody. The American fired and killed everybody.”


    bushking